Jarek N.:
Dear Ali Sina. Thank you for accepting this Interview.

Sina:
It is my pleasure.

Jarek:
Q01: You have often stated that Islam is a dangerous cult which promotes violence. Yet many Islamic scholars and officials say that this is only a misunderstanding, a bad picture of Islam made by few misguided terrorists. They say that Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance. In fact, the word “islam” actually means “peace” in Arabic. How can you explain this difference between their opinion and yours?

Sina:
Words can mean different things to different people. It is important to understand what people mean when they use a certain word. Let’s make an example. Take the word gay. Fifty years ago, gay meant exclusively cheerfulness, lighthearted excitement, merry or bright colors. Today this word has a different meaning. You won’t call a cheerful person gay because it could be understood as something else.

Just as the same word can mean different things in different times, it can also mean different things in different cultures. Islam does not mean peace. It means submission. The word “peace” for Muslims has a different meaning. Peace, according to Muslims, will be achieved when everyone submits to Islam. Muslims can’t offer peace. They can offer truce. In their minds, peace will be achieved only when you are subdued and they are the masters. Any other arrangement is not Islamic.

Recently the newly elected leaders of Hamas, who have been surprisingly honest, have spelled the concept of Islamic peace eloquently. They said that they won’t give up on their quest to destroy Israel but meanwhile, as long as they are weak and realizing that such dream is not yet possible, they are willing to work out a truce, to be broken when they feel strong enough to wipe out Israel from the map and establish the “peace” as it is acceptable by Islam.

Muhammad divided the world in two sectors. One he called Dar us Salam (House of Peace) and the other, Dar al Harb (House of War). All countries, where Islam is not the ruling authority, are Dar al Harb. It is the duty of the Muslims to wage Jihad in Dar al Harb, overthrow the governments and force people into submission. This is the only kind of peace that Islam recognizes.

The concept of Islamic peace is expressed in the verse 2.193 of the Quran.

“And fight them until fitnah is no more, and religion is for Allah.”

What is fitnah? Fitnah means sedition, perfidy or mischief. In Islamic terminology it means resisting Islam or disbelief. For example this site is fitnah.

All translators of the Quran have translated fitnah as oppression, tumult, persecution, etc. This is taqiyya. They have invariably lied to conceal the real meaning of the verse and fool the Western reader.

At the end of an article written to refute me, the author offers a prayer and asks Allah to “give all Muslims the strength to remain true to Your chosen path in the face of the fitnah inflicted upon us by the enemies of Islam.” I have no means of persecution. Clearly, fitnah means disbelief and criticizing Islam and not persecution.

When we say the objective of Islam is to force people into submission, it does not mean that you’ll be forced into conversion. It means that you’ll become a dhimmi, a subordinate to Muslims. You work and pay the Jizyyah, an extortion fee, to the Muslims who would treat you as second class citizen. They become the master race and you, their virtual slave and the source of their livelihood.

Bukhari 4, 53, 388:
Narrated Juwairiya bin Qudama At-Tamimi:
We said to ‘Umar bin Al-Khattab, oh Chief of the believers! Advise us.” He said, “I advise you to fulfill Allah’s Convention (made with the Dhimmis) as it is the convention of your Prophet and the source of the livelihood of your dependents (i.e. the taxes from the Dhimmis).”

The good news is that you can change your status by converting to Islam. So in a very sarcastic sense, there is no compulsion in Islam. You convert “voluntarily”. But you are free not to convert by accepting subjugation, humiliation, discrimination and constant harassment. What can be more democratic?

This meaning of “peace” is understood by all the Muslims. However they know that the non-Muslims have a different understanding of this word. So, they deceitfully promote their religion as a religion of peace taking advantage of the fact that the root of both words Islam and Salam is slm. One means submission and the other means peace. Even though the peace in Islam is understood as submission.

Jarek:
Q02: Muslims repeatedly say that lying is forbidden in Islam. However, you think that when many Muslims say Islam is not violent, they are lying. The purpose of it is allegedly to fool the Westerners. How do you prove this claim?

Sina:
I already explained that Muslims have different meanings for the same words that we use. They are so convinced of the “truth” of Islam that they do not perceive Jihad/terrorism, or dhimmitude as violence.

There is an Islamic teaching called taqiyya. Taqiyya means deception or concealing and disguising one’s beliefs and intentions to fool the adversary. According to Muhammad all forbidden things become permissible if they are to be used for the advancement of Islam. So Muslims can lie, steal, murder and rape with complete clear conscience because they are convinced of doing the right thing.

To understand this let me make an example. A butcher at the meat shop does not have pangs of conscience for slaughtering animals. The society accepts that he is not doing anything wrong but rather providing a service. The butcher does not feel guilty because his compass of right and wrong do not tell him that what he is doing is wrong. The same applies to all of us meat eaters. We don’t feel guilty every time we eat a hamburger. A Hindu might feel very differently. He would probably feel tormented with the thought of eating beef. The difference between the Hindu and us is that we have different compasses that point to different directions. What to him is awful, to us is normal.

Everyone has seen the videos of beheadings that Muslim Jihadis release. You see that during the most despicable acts imaginable, which is the cold blooded murder of another human being, they invoke the name of their deity Allah. This shows that they do not perceive this dastardly act as wrong. On the contrary, this is to them an act of worship. They commit these killings to please Allah. Their compass does not tell them that they are doing anything wrong. That compass is set by the Quran which everyone, including the foolish non-Muslim appeasers respect and call “holy”. So in the Muslim mind, what you and I perceive as heinous and evil is divine. Just as you don’t consider yourself to be a bad person for eating hamburger, a Muslim can kill the non-believers with no compunction and he does not believe that what he does is wrong.

The life of a non-Muslim to him is worth as much as the life of a chicken is worth to you and me. We don’t go around killing every chicken we see. In fact we keep them and feed them as long as they are useful to us. But we don’t lose sleep when we have to slaughter them. So it is not that Muslims will necessarily go around massacring every non-Muslim. As long as these non-Muslims are useful to them, they are granted protection. In fact dhimmi means protected. The non-believers will remain protected, as long as they pay the Jizzyah “with willing submission and feel themselves subdued” 9:29

The world of Islam is a world completely distinct from ours. Muslims have a different set of values. They look at the world through the contorted mirror of Islam and everything they see is warped. That is the only reality they know. Islam is their only point of reference. Therefore when they commit the most dastardly acts such as murder of school children, they genuinely don’t know that what they are doing is evil.

This makes Muslims very dangerous. What distinguishes us humans from animals is our conscience. Once our conscience is gone we lose our humanness. Without conscience, humans can be far more dangerous than beasts. Beasts kill for food, humans kill for ideology. Beasts kill just enough to eat. Humans can kill endlessly.

On 1 September 2005, Al Jazeera aired a tape featuring Mohammad Sidique Khan, one of the London bombers of 7/7, in which he said:

“I and thousands like me are forsaking everything for what we believe. Our drive and motivation doesn’t come from tangible commodities that this world has to offer. Our religion is Islam, obedience to the one true God and following the footsteps of the final prophet messenger.”

Here is the truth coming from the mouth of the horse. Every other reason Muslims give you is an excuse. The truth is that the terrorists are motivated by an ideology. It has nothing to do with what we do. They will give you all the excused to justify their terrorism. They will blame the victim. But the truth is that they are doing all these killings because they are waging Jihad. They will continue killing us until we submit and surrender. What they want is establishment of Khalifat worldwide.

I started warning people about the danger of Islam since 1998. Before 9/11 when Islam was still unknown to many, a Muslim sent me an email in which he chided me for revealing over the Internet the fact that Muhammad had slept with a 9 years old child. He said, even though I was no more a Muslim I owed at least that much loyalty to Islam to not make public this information. Then he ruefully lamented that the “damage has already been done”. This is typical Islamic thinking. The fact that Muhammad was a pedophile did not trouble this Muslim. What bothered him was disclosing that information and tarnishing the image of Islam. This behavior is consistent with narcissistic personality disorder. The narcissist’s main concern is the preservation of his image. Deeds don’t matter. Image is what counts. For Muslims image is everything. They have to preserve this image at all cost and taqiyya is the way to do it.

You ask for proof. There are many. Imam Ghazali’s authority in Islam is indisputable. He says: “When it is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible” [1]

Jarek:
Q03: Islam considers itself to be the world’s fastest growing religion. In fact, many people nowadays convert to Islam in the West, many of them of western origin. Why do you think this religion attracts so many people? What benefit does Islam give to converts?

Sina:
Islam takes advantage of two structural flaws that exist in the Western society. One is political correctness (PC) and other is the decline of morality.

Political correctness is an intellectual sickness. It means lying when telling the truth is not expedient. It is a disgusting habit and yet it is so widespread and so common that it is considered to be normal. This white man’s weakness for Muslims is godsend. They take full advantage of it and try to suffocate the truth through it. The recent row over the cartoons is a good example. Muslims insult all other religions. The Quran is an insult to the Jews, the Christians and everyone else. It calls the Jews apes, pigs and rats. All the non-believers are najis (filthy, impure) and hell bond. The Quran even instructs the Muslims to fight the unbelievers, chop their fingertips, behead them, crucify them and deal with them harshly. 5:33, 9:14, 9:73 However, Muslims went berserk when a Danish Newspaper published a few cartoons of Muhammad.

What drove so many Muslims to this much insanity? They wanted the western countries to apologize. Why? because this gives them a sense of empowerment. It makes them feel good about themselves, it stokes their ego.

The naïve PC westerners did not realize that this is a ploy – a step in the ongoing jihad to subdue the non-Muslims, and several western countries issued apologies to placate the Muslims. That was a victory for Islam.

Political correctness is a major defect of the western ethos. Some Western countries have even passed blasphemy laws that would put you in legal hot waters if you say anything negative about Islam. Oriana Fallaci is being sued in her own country, Italy for writing The Force of Reason. This means that the truth about Islam cannot be said but Muslims are given total freedom to spread their religion with lies. Islam thrives were truth is suppressed. That is one reason that westerners convert to Islam. They are lied to. How do you expect a society to survive when truth is banned and lies are allowed? PC is insanity. It is a major structural flaw that if not corrected, will eventually make the Western civilization crumble.

The other structural flaw in the western society is the rampant immorality. In the name of freedom, libertinage and immorality are promoted. Pornography is protected as freedom of speech and is easily accessible through the Internet, TV and movies even by children. Judeo-Christianity, which despite their past excesses and present flaws, promote morality, family values and decency, are now under attack. Funny thing is that it is politically correct to vilify Judaism and Christianity, but it is not when it comes to Islam.

The problem is that we have thrown out the baby with the bathwater. We got rid of religion but at the same time we throw away morality too. Alternative lifestyles have gained legitimacy. Not only homosexuality is completely accepted, gays have even “pride” parades which are grotesque displays of obscenity. Homosexuality is a disorder no different from zoophilia (bestiality), necrophilia (erotic attraction to corpses), coprophilia (sexual arousal associated with feces), urophilia (sexual arousal associated with urine), pedophilia, and a host of other paraphilias (sexual deviances). Our sexuality is affected by our fantasies. Some of these fantasies have their roots in our childhood. We have the power to control our thoughts but many people don’t do it because they get pleasure in their fantasies.

One thing is to have the protection of human rights for homosexuals and quite something else is this promotion of indecency. It would be immoral and unethical to deny the homosexuals their human rights. But it is also immoral to consider disorders as normal. None of these deviances are biological. They are acquired by fantasizing about them.

A member of the FFI forum wrote: “I have a client who told me in detail the whole story of his transformation, in a year’s time, from a homophobic heterosexual into a bisexual. The first 40 years of his life he was as repulsed as any hetero by the idea of contact with other males’ genitals, or any kind of sexual relation to males. In a year’s time, to his own amazement and great discomfort, he found that through the working of his own imagination, active in internet sex chat rooms, he was turning by an odd route into a bisexual of sorts, who occasionally dressed as a female and did sexual favors for men.”

This is not uncommon at all. Once you are exposed to an idea, you become “curious” and eventually you want to experiment it.

It is propaganda that people, who had lived a full life of heterosexuality, were married and had children, were denying their real sexuality all that time. There is historic evidence that entire populations can convert to homosexuality under certain conditions.

In ancient China where the emperors had thousands of wives, and obviously could not satisfy all of them, the imperial wives sought sexual release with other harem inhabitants, including eunuchs.” [2]

Also ancestral law in ancient Sparta mandated same-sex relationships with youths who were coming of age for all adult men, so long as the men eventually took wives and produced children. The Spartans thought that love and erotic relationships between experienced and novice soldiers would solidify combat loyalty and encourage heroic tactics as men vied to impress their lovers. [3]

These stories show that people can be conditioned to become homosexuals. Just as rats can be fixed to acquire taste for rats and become cannibal, or dogs can be trained to become man eaters (as some Persian kings used to have them) people can be introduced gradually into homosexuality and that is what the porn industry does and those who disagree dare not protest for the fear of being branded bigots. This is another symptom of sick PC mentality.

Women are particularly targeted by lesbians and are encouraged to enter their circle. There is an active campaign to “homosexualize” the society, by first claiming that it is normal and then by gradually desensitizing the population and making them “curious” and eventually bisexual and homosexual. On one hand we hear adamant denial that homosexuality is an acquired taste. You are made to believe that people are born with it and on the other hand I have seen movies on TV promoting lesbianism as the solution to failed marriages where a completely heterosexual woman is helped compassionately by her lesbian friends and slowly is introduced into this lifestyle where eventually she finds her happiness by becomes a lesbian.

Homosexuality is a cause, much like a religion. What is the philosophy behind gay pride parades? The same philosophy that there is behind Muslim demonstrations! Show of force and promotion of the ethos! Homosexuals promote their lifestyle much like religionists promote their religion. I suppose they realize that the bigger is their number, the more political clout they can wield.

Make no mistake: Homosexuals’ human right must be protected. It is bigoted to discriminate against people based on their sexual orientation or preferences just as it is to discriminate based on race or religion. Nonetheless there is no justification to promote this lifestyle and pretend that it is normal. What about bisexuality and promiscuity? Are these normal too? Do we have to live out all our sexual fantasies? We are in control of our fantasies. If a certain fantasy is pernicious, we can replace is with a different fantasy. Promiscuity is particularly promoted by homosexuals and bisexuals.

We are living in a culture that if you criticize immorality you could be branded as a “bigot”. I am going to lose a lot of support just by saying this. I am not a politician and I am not running a popularity contest. My job is to defend our world from Islam. You asked why the westerners convert to Islam and I must tell the truth as I see it. If that offends anyone, let him be offended.

Recently the Supreme Court judges of Canada legalized swinger clubs where people reconvene and practice swapping or swinging, even orgy gang-bangs. The Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin wrote: “Consensual conduct behind code-locked doors can hardly be supposed to jeopardize a society as vigorous and tolerant as Canadian society”. The lawyer for the swinger clubs said “It does not contaminate society. It does not hurt; it does not do any harm to society and to the public in general”.

Are these fair statements? What message are we sending to our children? What values are we espousing as the society? What is so vigorous about the Canadian or Western society when there are no moral standards set in place at all? Let us not confuse libertinage with tolerance. A lax society is not a vigorous society. It is in fact a very vulnerable and weak society that can fall at anytime.

Homosexuals have made the world believe that their sexual choice is beyond their control. But is wife swapping also beyond our control? No! the truth is that the western society promotes perversity. Beaches are filled with nudists. Is that the insignia of a vigorous society? Make a Google search with “Christian nudists” and see how many entries you find. If you want to be nudist why call it Christian? Where did Jesus say that it is Christian to flaunt your genital to everyone? Do as you please; but why defile Christianity and make Islam look attractive? Leave something sacred for heaven’s sake.

While the Western society gives total freedom to the individuals to do whatever “consenting adults” please, which admittedly is better than having the government poke into your private life and your bedroom, like in Islamic countries, there are no moral compasses to tell what is right from wrong. The very notion of right and wrong has come under question. The motto is “if it feels good do it”. Hedonism rules! Talking about morality can be offensive. Morality is a politically incorrect subject. Many people are genuinely offended if someone speaks of morality and family values. It is okay if you talk about your sexual fantasies and deviances. This is called “liberation”. But you would be frowned at if you talk about morality in public. Then you’d be accused of trying to impose your values on others.

Talk to those who have converted to Islam and ask them why. (See this video) Read the stories of Cat Stevens (now Yusuf Islam), John Walker Lindh (the American Taliban), Yvonne Ridley (the BBC journalist who was captured by the Taliban in Afghanistan and upon returning to UK converted to Islam), Muriel Degauque (the Belgian woman who became the first White suicide bomber in Iraq killing six people) or the pop singer Michael Jackson. All these people come from broken or dysfunctional families where proper guidance was lacking. All of them were dragged into excesses of sex, drug or booze prior to converting to Islam. John, at the age of 16 had to endure the trauma of witnessing his father leave his mother to pursue his homosexual relationship with another man. These converts were searching for an authority to pull them out of their tormented lives and give them the direction that they have never had. They craved for an iron fist to set their lives straight. In Islam they found the answer. They, and basically all those who convert to Islam will tell you that they were fed up of the immorality in the West and that was the main reason they were attracted to Islam – going from one extreme to another.

Nature hates vacuum. Once a society is depleted of moral values, it creates a vacuum that will be filled by doctrines that hold to such values, even though those values are draconian and oppressive. In fact the more a society is devoid of morality, the more promising prudish and unpermissive doctrines look. Licentious societies create a spiritual vacuum that legalistic religions such as Islam fill. The glitter of a libertine life is soon faded and the soul yearns for something more meaningful, more profound and otherworldly. “There must be more to life than carnal pleasures”, is the inner calling of every soul.

A society that is not founded on morality falls apart and becomes easy prey to puritan cults such as Islam that on the surface, promote family values and morality.

The strength of an individual is not in his extreme freedom and libertine lifestyle, but in the stalwartness of his character and his moral vigor. The society is made of individuals. What is true for an individual is also true for the society. A society that is not founded on moral values is doomed to fall. 1700 years ago the advanced but lax Roman Empire fell to an obscure puritan sect called Christianity and more than one thousand years of darkness cast their shadow over Europe. The danger today is that with the fall of the Western civilization, what would come to power is one of the most nefarious and dangerous doctrines humanity has ever seen, from which there could be no recovery ever.

Irrespective of our intellectual and technological advances, if we are lascivious as a society we will be vulnerable, not just vis-à-vis Islam but to any absolutist doctrine that may rise from the East or the West. The human society is part of the nature. It responds to natural laws. If the pendulum is pulled to one extreme, it will swing back to the other extreme. This is an inescapable truth based on natural laws. If we want our civilization to survive, we have to watch for the extremes. We have to reclaim our morality, both individually and as the society. To protect ourselves from extremisms, we have to maintain moderation.

Licentious lifestyles and sexual experimentations promoted by the New Age cults and social liberals destabilize family. All the technological feats are ornaments; the foundation of the human society is family. Once the foundation is weakened, the society will fall. Morality is the mortar of a strong, healthy and functional family.

This is in nutshell why westerners fall prey to Islam. It is because of these two structural flaws. Political correctness and immorality will make the Western society crumble. It is not enough to be on the offensive. We must also shore up our own defenses and make our society immune to attacks. Sadly we are doing neither.

Jarek:
Q04: You are asking people to mock Islam. By making fun of it and insulting its dogmas and principles you think good and intelligent people will start to be ashamed of being Muslims and will abandon this religion. However, the cartoons published by Jyllands-Posten were only very mild, and yet the reaction of the Muslims worldwide was the opposite. They reacted in unison, in some countries even violent, killing tens of Christians and their faith seems to become even stronger. How do you explain that?

Sina:
Why do you think they reacted so violently? It is because you pressed their sore spot. If you are strong you can take a punch and not flinch, but if you have a sore spot, a nudge on that sore spot will make you scream. Muslims committed the huge blunder of revealing their vulnerability. Now the world knows what hurts them. When you find your opponent’s weak spot, it is exactly where you want to hit him.

Muhammad was a narcissist and Muslims, by having entered into his bubble universe have become narcissists by extension. More precisely, they are reverse narcissists. A commonly used term for reverse narcissist is co-dependent.

The biggest preoccupation of the narcissist is the preservation of his image. But the reverse narcissists do not have self image. The narcissist destroys the self image of his co-dependants and gives them his own image to cling to. He destroys their identity and selfhood and makes them believe that their glory and greatness is in their submission and obedience to him. He makes them swallow that without him they are nothing. That they are like specks of dust floating in the air, invisible and insignificant, but they can light up and become visible if they come under his light. That is how the narcissist controls his co-dependants.

The first thing Islam does is to destroy the self image of the believers. It convinces them that without Islam they are worthless creatures only fit for hellfire. It tells them that their culture is jahelyyah (ignorance) and their ancestral religion was taaghoti (satanic). They are made to despise their identity and selfhood and seek their glory in their submission to Islam and slavery to its deity who was Muhammad’s own alter ego. Islam has taken everything from its wretched believers. They are robbed from their identity and self pride. All they have now is Islam. That is why Islam for Muslims is more than just a religion. It is their identity. When you criticize Islam, they perceive it as an attack on their identity and cringe with pain. They take that not only as an insult but also as an assault on their person. Like a corned animal they become vicious and fight back with all their might – a fight of survival. That is why you see such a violent reaction to a few silly cartoons.

Why we must continue the campaign of humiliation and ridicule? It’s because we must destroy that false image of Islam to which the Muslims cling for their identity. That idol must be smashed. When that false image is destroyed there would be nothing left to cling to and only then the Muslims will be able to find themselves and recover their lost selfhood. The co-dependant must see that his narcissist, the object of his adoration, is not that great but a fraud, a loser, a clown. This can’t be done through logical argumentations alone. By trying to disprove the claims of a fruitcake with philosophical and logical expostulations and remonstrations you give him importance. Muhammad was an idiot, a psychopath, a crackpot. He needs to be laughed at not disproved. What is there to disprove about splitting the moon, climbing the seventh heaven riding on the back of a horse with human face and meeting dead prophets who tell him to bargain with God to reduce the number of prayers from 50 to 5 times per day? Is God stupider than his prophets? The entire Quran is a big joke. If it was not so violent, it would be the biggest comic book ever written.

Muhammad was a jackass. People who believe in him are stupid. Let us call a spade as spade. These people must be laughed at. They, and their screwball prophet have to be ridiculed not respected. Let them cringe, let them wince, let them agonize. We must demolish this fetish and break the shackles of these wretched people. They must be set free and the only way to do that is to demolish their fetish.

Once Muhammad is ridiculed, once this talisman is destroyed, Muslims will be liberated and they will leave Islam. When that happens they’ll thank you.

It is not difficult to destroy Islam. Islam is the pumped up ego of a megalomaniac psychopath. Muhammad was a narcissist madman. Just as a huge balloon can be deflated by a small needle, all it takes to make Islam explode is to ridicule its loony inventor and its brainless followers.

Shame works! I have seen it work many times. It worked for me. It was not just the truth but also the savagery of the Muslims that made me want to distance myself from Islam. I was ashamed of Islam; I was embarrassed of what Muhammad had done and what Muslims were doing. I thought to myself, what would I say if people find out the truth about Muhammad’s perversions and ask me, how can you follow a pedophile? What is your opinion about the ridiculous scientific and logical blunders of the Quran? Wouldn’t that be embarrassing? Wouldn’t I look like a fool? Shame works on those who have the sense of shame. Those are the ones we want to rescue. Shame does not work on those who have no shame. Those we don’t want anyway. Let the fools remain Muslims. We want to salvage intelligent and good people who call themselves Muslims by error.

I know the Muslim psychology. It is all pomposity and bravado. I give you my word that if Islam is ridiculed publicly and systematically, it will be defeated. Shame is a great motivator as well as deterrent. Do not underestimate the power of ridicule. This is serious stuff not a laughing matter.

Jarek:
Q05: What do you think should be an appropriate reaction of Europe in the face of Muslim protests against publishing of the cartoons?

Sina:
Sadly several European countries have already sheepishly apologized profusely. That is the worst thing to do. But the good thing about Europe is that people rule. Irrespective of the apologies issued by the governments, people must continue the campaign of ridiculing Islam relentlessly. We are all on the Internet now and this is godsend. Every one of us must become a cyberwarrior and mock Muhammad, Islam and the Muslims. Use your talent. Draw cartoons based on the hadith and the Quran. You can find tons of ridiculous stuff in these books to lampoon. Write articles, lyrics, jokes, plays, do whatever you can to ridicule Muhammad the prophet pretender and Muslims. Don’t heed to their howls and cries. This is for their own good. Islam is the cause of their downfall, as well as a threat to our lives. We must help them get rid of this curse by showing them its stupidity and by shattering its pompous icon. If you really love them, ridicule them, make them the butt of the jokes, deride and humiliate them. Let them suffer. Let them agonize in pain. This is their remedy.

How much ridicule is enough? until it hurts. The pain of shame must become bigger than the comfort of clinging to this false fetish. When you see their eyes are popping out of there eyeballs, their veins bulging in their neck and foams forming at their mouths and they are ready to explode you know that the remedy is working, give them more. They will either die of heart attack or they will come to their senses and recover from this insanity.

Since the attachment to the cult of Islam is psychological, the solution must also be psychological. We have all the logical proof that Islam is false. But logic has its limitation. Brainwashed people dismiss logic and pride themselves in their blind faith. Psychological warfare is extremely powerful. The Muslim bravado must be destroyed by humiliations and ridicule.

Jarek:
Q06: But is that practical? What if they become violent? If they reacted so violently to a few innocent cartoons, how would they react to an intense campaign of ridicule as you are suggesting? What concrete realistic measures would you recommend to European politicians in order to prevent violent Muslim attacks on European soil?

Sina:
I said already that Muslims have entered into Muhammad’s narcissistic bubble universe and as such evince his narcissistic personality disorder. This is common trait in all cults. Cultists become extensions of the psychopathic mind of the cult leader. Narcissists are bullies. Bullies are control freaks. They want to force their will on you, dominate you, humiliate you and make you respect them, treat them preferentially and even fear them. Fear is the fuel of the narcissist bully. He becomes stronger by instilling fear as fire become bigger with gasoline.

How would you deal with the bully? The worst thing is to show fear and try to appease him. Your fear and retreat only makes him bolder and he will demand more.

Dr. Sam Vaknin, the author of the Malignant Self Love, specializes in narcissism. He says that narcissists are cowards and easily intimidated. “The narcissist is tamed by the very same weapons that he uses to subjugate others,” Dr. Vaknin explains. Vaknin’s advice is:

Mirror the narcissist’s actions and repeat his words. If he threatens – threaten back and credibly try to use the same language and content. …Be critical, denigrating, humiliating, go down to his level – because that’s the only way to penetrate his thick defences. Faced with his mirror image – the narcissist always recoils.

Faced with real threat, the bully instantly succumbs and obsequiously tries to make amends, moving from one (cold and bitter, cynical and misanthropic, cruel and sadistic) pole to another (warm, even loving, fuzzy, engulfing, emotional, maudlin, and saccharine). [2]

Whether you have to deal with one bully or a billion of them, the principle is the same. You must not negotiate with the bully. You must not meet his demands. You must not let him feel that he is controlling you. On the contrary, he must be given a clear signal that he can’t manipulate you. You must make him realize that you are not afraid of him. Never make compromises with the bully; never offer him the olive branch. He interprets that as the sign of your weakness and becomes more daring.

You must make him fear you. Muslims know we are handicapped by our laws and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and they use them against us. Whatever makes us weak makes them strong. Muslims never respect anyone’s human rights but demand it from others. The Western governments must pass laws making it easy to deport the trouble makers. The policy of zero tolerance towards religious violence must be declared across the board. If the Muslims realize that with the first sign of disturbance they could be kicked out of the country with no possibility to appeal, they will behave. Do not waist your resources giving them lawyers to defend themselves. They deride at our laws and use them against us. If they are arrested during Islamic protests, they should be deported in matter of days, not weeks. No lawyers are needed. No trial is necessary. These things do not exist in Islamic countries where one Mullah makes the decision. That is the system they like and respect. Give them a taste of their own medicine.

Muslims will not respect our laws unless they fear them. The laws in democratic countries are child play compared to Islamic laws. Muslims don’t want democracy and they scorn freedom. They should be treated in accordance to Islamic laws. This is not possible in democratic countries. We can’t behead the detractors like in Saudi Arabia, or hang them like in Iran. We can’t torture people or flog them. But we can round them up and send them to Islamic countries where they will be dealt with in accordance to the laws that they so much uphold.

Islamic terrorism is not common crime but an act of war. Jihad is war. For the Jihadi it is a war; we must also accept it as such. Home grown Muslim militants must be treated, not just as enemy combatants but as traitors.

This is not cruelty but compassion. If Muslims fear us, they will become good citizens and behave. This benefits both them and us. If on the other hand weakness is shown, they become emboldened, more lives will be lost, more terrorist attacks will take place and eventually they may suffer much more dire consequences. There is a limit to people’s patience. If nothing is done and people rise, things won’t be very pretty and wet and dry will burn together. We must become tough now, before it’s too late.

Jarek:
But you can’t just deport the Muslims so easily. What to do with the second and the third generation Muslims? Even though Muslims do not abide by any law, we do.

Sina:
And that is your handicap!

Say, you play chess with a child where you abide by all the rules but he does not. Who do you think will win? Suppose your team plays football with another team. You observe all the rules but the other team does not. Of course they will win. This is a war. This war is not new. It is a 1400 years old war. The non-Muslims have tried to be reasonable and play clean throughout the history. They invariably underestimated the evil of Islam. They failed to grasp the fact that their opponents were Muslims and as such worst than beasts. Why do you think Muslims could subdue mightier people than themselves? It is because they played dirty from day one and observed no rules. Others were bond by rules while the Muslims never paid any attention to any rule and therefore they won.

The only rule Muslims know is to win. It does not matter how. All rules can be broken as long as they win the war. They can lie, they can deceive, they can break their treaties as Muhammad did, they can ambush or use terror, assassinate, massacre the children and bomb civilians. Muslims can even kill each other as long as this improves their chance of winning. This is no more different from you playing chess and sacrificing a few pawns to check mate. In the game of chess pawns don’t matter. All that matters is that you win at the end. Muslims have no more regards for human lives, even their own, and will readily sacrifice them as long as this improves their chances of winning. Muslims know that through mayhem and chaos, where no rules apply, they have the best change of winning. What is happening in Iraq these days, where Muslims are killing Muslims, is a clear proof of what I say. The idea is to defeat the USA. To do that they must do everything possible to make its plans fail. Democracy must be defeated and the best way to do that is to bring about a civil war. If in the process hundreds of thousands or even millions of fellow Muslims are killed, that is acceptable.

What stops Muslims is fear. Not just empty threats but real fear. Whatever it takes to strike fear in the hearts of the jihadis and the Muslim bullies must be done. This means monitoring the sermons in all the mosques and with the first incitement to violence, not only deport the Mullah but also shut down the mosque. This means decaling CAIR and its counterparts in other countries, enemies of democracy and ban them. This means declaring the hate laden verses of the Quran anti-constitutional and remove them from the Quran. Of course that won’t be possible and therefore the entire Quran should be declared anti-constitutional and banned.

Muslims in the Western countries must be summoned to pledge their oath of allegiance once again and they must undergo intense detoxification. If they waiver, they should be sent home. The bottom line is that Muslims must start fearing our laws in order to be able to respect them. The details of how this fear should be implemented, should be worked out by the politicians.

If they do not have loyalty to the people, culture and constitution of the country in which they live, they are traitors. Those who strive to undermine our security and overthrow our governments are the fifth column. Send them to the countries of their parents. The governments in those countries know how to deal with problematic people a la Musulman. That is how Muslims can be brought in line, not through democracy and human rights, which they sneer at. Perhaps you have to give these countries some economic incentives to take in these discontent Muslims. That would be well-spent money. What they would do with them is their business. They are all Muslim brothers. Let them handle this among brothers, the Islamic way. Turn them over and forget about them.

Our governments’ first duty is to save the lives of the law abiding people and our democracy. WE are the people. WE are the ones who are working and paying taxes. WE are the ones who pay the salaries of the politicians and it is OUR tax money that maintains these trouble-making Islamic hoodlums and thugs. They are mostly bums and a drain on our welfare systems. They are parasites. Study after study show that Muslims in Western countries contribute less to the economy than they receive. Enough is enough. If they don’t like it here, round them up and send them back. If they do not want to integrate, they should pack up and go where they can feel at home.

If a pack of hungry wolves raid a village, the authorities have the obligation to protect the people and not the wolves. These Islamists who threaten us with holocausts and nine elevens have no right to live among us. It is the duty of the governments to protect our safety. This is a war. We need protection from our enemies.

Once the table is turned and the bully realizes that he is in serious danger, he will change his way and becomes as docile as a pussy cat. Sacrifice a few, to set the example for the rest. They will get the message and will mend their way. That is the language Muslims understand. Bully knows the language of fear very well. He speaks fear and responds to it.

Tough problems require tough measures. These solutions may not please the lily-livered and the politically correct fools but the alternative is worse. The alternative is civil war and rivers of blood in our streets. If we don’t address the problem of Muslims in the West soon, the riots we witnessed in France a few months ago will turn into civil wars all across the Europe and the bombings we saw in Madrid and in London will become daily events. When Muslims threaten you, take it seriously.

What would happen if you do nothing? If the governments do not take action to subdue the Islamic bullies, people will rise and take the matter in their own hands and chaos will ensue. Nothing is more dangerous than doing nothing. We are already seeing the sign of discontent among the people in Australia , and several countries in Europe. It would be foolish for the governments to not take drastic action to reduce the threat of Islam. If vigilantism takes root, it would be their fault. The handwritings are on the wall. Only a blind can’t see them. The governments must show leadership. Immediate and drastic measures are needed to bring the situation under control. We will have to get tough with the bully if we want to tame him. An ounce of preventions is worth more than a pound of cure.

At the same time everyone must realize that this is not an ethnic war. Our greatest allies are the ex-Muslims. Many of them are in grave danger including by their own families. Women are particularly vulnerable. Protection must be provided for them and it must be safe and easy for them to leave Islam and even their fanatical families. They are our greatest assents. They are the unsung heroes who have valiantly broken their own shackles and can help others to break theirs. If the civil war is to be averted in Europe, it is thanks to them. The future of mankind and its peace depends on them. Islamic terrorism will be defeated, when a great number of Muslims start leaving Islam. We have to make this exodus as easy as possible.

Do not confuse the ex-Muslims with the so called “moderate Muslims”. There is no moderation in Islam. The correct word for moderate Muslim is hypocrite Muslim. Hypocrite Muslims are worse than the fanatical Muslims. They deceive you to stab you in the back.

We must also encourage the debate on Islam. Is Islam a religion or a political movement in the guise of religion? What is the ultimate goal of Islam? Isn’t it true that Muslims everywhere must strive to overthrow the government and establish the caliphate? How can Muslims be loyal to the country in which they live, to its democracy and constitution, and at the same time belong to a party or cult that aims to destroy that democracy and subdue that country? These questions should not be swept under the carpet. They must be discussed in open debates and Muslims must be asked to answer them. Where their loyalty lies? Are we not harboring our own enemies among us?

No problem can be solved unless it is thoroughly understood. No question is so impolite that can’t be asked. If Muslims have satisfactory answers to these questions, there is no reason for them to be upset. They should come forth and dissipate all misunderstandings. But if they decide to resort to hooliganism and throw tantrums to avoid answering, it is clear that they do not want you to know the answer to these questions. “Oh, you are hurting my sensitivity” is not a satisfactory answer. It is argumentum ad misericordiam and a logical fallacy. As Jesus said, only truth will set us free. This is a major problem we are facing today, perhaps the biggest humanity has ever faced and we must know the truth. You can’t solve any problem blindly, let alone one as complex and critical as the one we are facing.

My other advice for the European politicians is not to deal with the rogue regimes. For years, the Iranian dissidents have been warning the European governments of the danger of the mullahs. They paid no heed and kept supporting these thugs, blinded by their short-sighted greed. Now that the prospect of a nuclear holocaust threatens their own existence they are contemplating to bomb the poor and the oppressed people of Iran. The foreign policies of the European governments have always been unethical. Politicians don’t give a hoot. People must demand ethical conduct from their governments even vis-à-vis other nations. We are ONE people! These lines we have drawn on the maps are illusions. We must treat people of all races and nationalities ethically.

Jarek:
Q07: One of the main principles of the democratic western world is the freedom of religion. Muslims, like any other religious group, should have the right to protest against mockery of their faith, to defend themselves against insult.

Sina:
Right and responsibility go hand in hand. You can’t give rights to those who are not responsible. If you want to let your canary out of the cage, the first thing you would do is to kick your cat out of the house. This does not mean you don’t love your cat, but he has no right to stay in the house because he can’t act responsibly. It would be foolish to wait until he kills the canary and then punish him. You already know the cat can’t be trusted. The problem with Muslims is that they too can’t be trusted and can’t act responsibly.

Christianity, Judaism and all other religions have been attacked and vilified for centuries. Someone even put a crucifix in a bottle of urine and called it art. Another person pained the picture of Marry using elephant dung for coloring. Unlike these innocent Danish cartoons, those were deliberate and grotesque insults. They were intended to offend and the Christians were offended. They even protested. Yet no buildings were torched, no one was shot, no stones were thrown, no flags were burnt, no street marches were organized and no carnage took place. The Christians protested with civility by writing articles. But look want happens when Muslims protest! It is sheer savagery. The bottom line is that those who can’t be responsible, should not have rights. Muslims who protest in non-Muslim countries, burn cars and threaten with holocausts and nine elevens must be rounded up and sent to where their parents came from. Human rights are for those who can behave like humans. If you can’t act responsibly you relinquish that right.

Is driving a right? You are entitled to a driving license if you can abide by the traffic laws and drive responsibly. If your driving endangers the lives of others, that license will be taken away from you. So rights and responsibilities are inseparable. If you can’t respect the rights of others, if by your belief and conduct you endanger the lives of other people, you are not entitled to any right.

If a person becomes a danger to a society, he should not live in that society. We don’t let psychopaths loose because they are dangerous to others. A bear and a deer are both wild animals. We allow the deer to roam in our backyard but we do not give the same right to the bear. It is because the bear is dangerous. Neither the bear nor the deer have rights. We humans give them rights. Taking in account our own security, we give to some animals some rights and deny the same to other animals.

Fanatical Muslims can be very dangerous to the society. 9/11, 3/11, 7/7 or countless other terrorist attacks on innocent civilians across the world show that we are dealing with a very dangerous clique. These people (and I use that term loosely) should not have rights. They should be kicked out of the country or locked up in concentration camps and treated as dangerous. A Persian proverb says, “Compassion to the wolf is cruelty to the lamb”.

In nutshell, stop apologizing! Become tough and threatening. You’ll be surprised to see how soon these ”valiant” jihadis will head back to their Pandora box.

Jarek:
Q08: Ayaan Hirsi Ali has recently said in an interview to German magazine Spiegel, that the only way of reforming Islam is to rid Quran of its absoluteness. If Muslims realize, that their holy scriptures has not been dictated by God, but created by humans, then there is a possibility that the religion may be reformed. After all, Christians also claim that Bible is a “word of God,” yet majority of them do not believe in hell, or that the world has been created in six days. They see these things as symbolic stories, but they still remain true to their faith.

Sina:
Ms. Ali is right. All the ex-Muslims will tell you the same thing. Islam can’t be reformed. It must be eradicated. I hear many westerners propose promoting Sufism, Ahmadiyya sect or other allegedly less violent versions of Islam to counter the more extremist streaks of Islam like Salafism and Wahhabism. That is sheer arrogance. It is nobody’s business to tell others what religion they should believe, which would certainly be met with sneer. It is one thing to teach your own faith to others and quite something else telling them to follow a religion that you yourself are not willing to follow.

This also underlies the fact that the westerners have no understanding of Islam. There are no tolerant versions of Islam. Muslims are tolerant when they are in minority. As soon as they come to power they drop the mask of toleration and start oppressing others. Even Muhammad was very tolerant when he was in Mecca and had no more than a handful of followers. Then he used to say: “There is no compulsion in religion” 2:256; “To you be your religion, and to me my religion”; 109:6 and advised his followers to “speak good to men” 2:83; “be patient” with the detractors 20:103 “and part from them courteously” 73:10; “pardon, with a gracious pardoning” 15:85 and “hold to forgiveness” 7:199. It was only when he came to power that he started butchering innocent people and bragged that he would cast terror in the hearts of those who did not agree with him 3.151, 8.012, 33.026.

Suppose there is a less violent version of Nazism; would you promote it?

No! Islam can’t be reformed. Muhammad was a control freak and he structured his cult in a way that not an iota of his words can be altered. In many parts of the Quran he made categorical statements that none can change the words of Allah (6:34, 6:115, 10:64) Islam is rigid like stone. You can’t bend it but you can smash it.

We can’t compare Islam to Christianity and Judaism and deduce that since those have reformed, this will too. This is a non sequitur fallacy. It is comparing apples to oranges. The Christians and the Jews do not believe that the Bible is the verbatim words of God. In fact it is clear that the books of the Bible are written by men – allegedly inspired men – but humans nonetheless. God in the Bible is spoken of in third person. This gives the believer a degree of caution. If the writers of the Bible were humans and humans are fallible, the Bible should not be taken literally. It is possible to interpret it, use one’s logic to understand it in the light of science and adapt its teachings to meet the needs of the time. This plasticity has allowed Christianity, Judaism and other religions to evolve. But no plasticity exists in the Quran. This book is believed by Muslims to be the verbatim words of God. How can you change the word of God? Other religions are living. They are changing and evolving. Islam is fossilized. It allows no change. It can’t be reformed.

Jarek:
Q09: Many say that Islam, as it is now about 1400 years old, is in the same phase as Christianity used to be during the Middle Ages. In that time, Christians also persecuted criticism of Christianity, or spread their religion by violence. Don’t you thing that Islam can develop similarly?

Sina:
The fundamental difference between these two cases is that what happened in Christendom of the middle Ages was the abuse of power. It was a clear case of corruption of the Church. You can’t find any justification in the teachings of Christ for the crimes perpetrated by the Church. On the other hand the rise of the Islamic terrorism is the result of the return to the pure Islam. While the teachings of Jesus are of love and forgiveness, the teachings of Muhammad are of hate, war and bloodshed. There is a fundamental difference between Jesus and Muhammad and their teachings. When the Jews brought a prostitute to Christ and asked him what to do with her because the law says stone her, Jesus said, let the one who has not committed any sin throw the first stone. This is a great teaching. To be happy as human beings, we don’t need lots of laws. All we need are few good teachings and this is one of them. See your own flaws first. Remove the beam in your own eye before attempting to remove the speck in the eye of your brother. Forgive other people’s sins so yours can be forgiven and be truthful because only truth will save you. These are good teachings. Whoever said them have spoken the truth. A truth that is eternal and unchanging.

Now compare this to Muhammad’s teachings. A woman accused of adultery was brought to him and while the Jews had abandoned the law of stoning, he insisted that the poor woman should be stoned because the Bible says so. [4] Yet at the same time he himself raped women captured in war and allowed his followers to do the same, even though these women were married before being captured, 4:24

Usually those who make such an erroneous comparison between Islam and other religions are not familiar with the shameful life of Muhammad, with his hateful teachings and the gory history of the expansion of Islam. Islam was violent from the start. Muhammad himself was the most ruthless terrorist. He bragged that he owed his victories to instilling terror. [5]

Power corrupts. If the Church is given too much power, it will become corrupted. So to keep the Church in line with the teachings of Christ, we must make sure that it can never have temporal power. Religion has its place and politics has its own. These two should not be mixed together or the result would be catastrophic.

With Islam it is a different story. In Islam religion and politics cannot be separated. Unlike other religions, Islam is political by its very nature. Also with the exception of Iran, in no Islamic country the Mullahs have temporal power. In all other Islamic countries violence is caused by the individual believers and not by the state. During the Middle Ages in Europe the problem was the Church or better said the ruling elite acting in the name of God. This problem exists in Iran, but in all other Islamic countries is the Umma, i.e. the community at large that is the problem.

The solution to the problem of the abuse of power in Christianity was to take away the power from the Church. The solution to the problem of Islamic violence and terrorism is to destroy the faith of the Muslims.

Jarek:
Q10: Your organization, the Faith Freedom International (FFI), unites people who have left Islam. You claim that the number of apostates is growing even faster than the number of Muslims, that apostasy, not Islam, is the fastest growing “religion”. However, we know that leaving Islam is not at all easy, apart from the fear of eternal suffering in hell, there is the real-world danger of being killed, as the punishment for apostasy according to sharia is death. Can you prove anyhow the numbers you are claiming? I see only limited number of people contributing to your website.

Sina:
FFI is not the only front of the war against Islamic obscurantism. Millions of Muslims have left Islam who have never heard of FFI.

2 million ethnic Muslims converted to Christianity in Russia

In Africa, 6 million Muslims convert to Christianity every year. “In every hour, 667 Muslims convert to Christianity. Everyday, 16,000 Muslims convert to Christianity. Ever year, 6 million Muslims convert to Christianity. These numbers are very large indeed”.

200,000 UK Muslims Left Islam

Mullahs and Imams Leave Islam and Enter Christianity.

50,000 Muslim Teenagers Murtads in Malaysia

Thousands of Kashmiri Muslims leave Islam!

Thousands of Bangladeshi, North African, Kashmiri, Indian Muslims, Central Asian Muslims Leave Islam.

10,000 French Muslims converted to Christianity

Some 35,000 Turks converted from Islam to Christianity last year

Listen to this clip: A Research by Prof. Ilyas Ba Yunus

But most Muslims do not convert to Christianity or other religions. The majority of them simply leave Islam silently and make no public announcements. We can’t have real statistics of those leaving Islam and not entering any other religion.

Every time Muslims make a show of savagery, millions of thinking Muslims leave Islam. I assure you that this row on cartoons has awakened many souls. The thinking Muslims become ashamed of this much barbarity and mindless behaviors. How can any sane person still believe in Islam after hearing that Muslims have killed completely innocent people in Nigeria and elsewhere over such a stupid thing like a few silly cartoons?

Millions of Iranians have left Islam and continue leaving it. They either convert to Zoroastrianism, Christianity or simply become secularists. They know nothing about FFI. Faithfreedom.org is blocked in Iran. There are many great scholars who use the medium of the satellite television and radio to reach the Iranians inside the country and bring them the same message of redemption from the bondage of Islam that is delivered by FFI. FFI has already reached millions of people and its readership is growing. But make no mistake; FFI is only one front of this International movement. Every one who leaves Islam becomes a new front. We are determined to save our people and the world. No one understands the danger of Islam like we do.

What is happening now is the renascence of the Islamic world. Someone asked why I call this movement “Islamic renascence” when some Muslim “reformists” also use the same terminology. But this friend did not pay enough attention. I am not saying Islamic renascence but the renascence of the Islamic world. There can be no renascence of Islam. Islam will be defeated and there would be as much of it left as it is of communism in the old Soviet Union. The liberation of Muslims does not mean Islamic liberation. It can happen only when they rid themselves from this curse.

The ex-Muslims are growing exponentially. You know about the power of the exponential growth. At first the growth may seem insignificant, but as time goes on, the growth becomes more noticeable. Two becomes four; four becomes eight, then 16, 32, 64, and so on. Repeat this thirty times and the number exceeds one billion. If our number doubles every year, it will take us no more than thirty years to defeat Islam completely. Our strength is in the fact that each person that we “conquer” becomes another staunch soldier and a companion of the trench in this war. Do not judge our success by our humble beginning or our apparent smallness of numbers. If you start with one and double it every year, in ten years you’ll have a mere 1000. That looks insignificant compared to 1.2 billion, which is our target number. You might say at this rate it will take us more than 10,000,000 years to finish the job. But keep doubling that number for another 10 years and you’ll exceed one million and in thirty years you’ll reach one billion. That is the magic of the exponential growth.

We have already defeated Islam in principle. The proof is right in the pages of faithfreedom.org for anyone who can read. Now all it takes is to take these proofs to all the Muslims. That is only a logistic problem. The cookie cutter has already been invented. Take that same success and repeat it.

We also need the support of the non-Muslims and their cooperation. They must help us make our message reach to all the corners of the world. But not just that, they must also stop being appeasers. Today the biggest obstacles in our way are those westerns who try to appease the Muslims. I heard in the news that the Italian government has offered to rebuild the recently bombed grand mosque in Iraq. This news almost made me vomit. How much foolishness is enough? How much appeasement is enough? Muslims don’t need more mosques. They need freedom of thought and freedom of speech. They need universities where these freedoms can be taught and exercised. Mosques do the opposite. They teach slavery of mind and suppression of thought. All these terrorisms and mayhem stem from the mosques. What the Italians have been smoking?

The appeasers, the politically correct and the useful idiots are our enemy number one. These fools are the ones who censor us and do everything they can to defend Islam. I have received hate mails from brainless Leftists who attacked me for criticizing Islam. Noam Chomsky, John Esposito and their like are the fifth column. Potentially they can do more harm than Bin Laden. The enemy within, or a misguided “friend” is often more dangerous than the enemy without.

Jarek:
Q11: Due to understandable reasons you and your cooperators working for the FFI remain in anonymity, Ali Sina is not your real name. However, have you ever considered the option to go public, to stand for your cause in politics? Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Oriana Fallaci, Robert Spencer, now the Jyllands Posten cartoonists, they all risk their lives for their right to criticize Islam. Maybe people will have to deal with your ideas more seriously, if you take the risk and appear in television, for example. There is always the risk of ending up like Theo van Gogh, but is the case not worth the risk?

Sina:
In nowhere I have made any statements on my name. This is something that the Wikipedians have said. How do they know? Wikipedia is not a reliable source. But why my name should be important? Suppose Ali Sina is a pseudonym, does this make my arguments less valid? Ali Dashti also published his book “The 23 Years of Prophetic Career” anonymously at first and Ibn Warraq also uses a pseudonym. What is important here is the message not the messenger. We are dispensable, but this message must be delivered and of course the chance of delivering it increases substantially while we still breathe.

Why I don’t like to be on TV? For several reasons. The first and foremost is that I am a private person. Some people give an arm and a leg to be on TV and have their 15 minutes of fame. I enjoy my privacy more than anything else. Each person is made differently. I don’t like to become a celebrity. I don’t like to be under the spotlight. I have never been the soul of the party and frankly don’t attend them much. My greatest pleasures are reading, writing and exploring the beauties of the nature. I will never run for politics. Public life is not for me. I like simplicity not extravagance. I like modesty not flamboyance. Apart from that, I know that I won’t be able to enjoy my walks when I have to constantly look over my shoulders to see whether a bearded guy is approaching with a concealed knife. Ayaan Hirsi Ali has bodyguards, courtesy of the Dutch government. It means she has little freedom. I can’t afford bodyguards and don’t want to live like that. I live in a sleepy little town in this great land called America where I see more deer than humans and hardly a Muslim. Knowing that I am safe, gives me the freedom to write anything I want and this is an awesome freedom.

Notes

[1] Ahmad Ibn Naqib al-Misri, The Reliance of the Traveller, translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller, Amana publications, 1997, section r8.2, page 745
[2] http://www.colorq.org/Articles/article.aspx?d=QHistory&x=chinresource2
http://www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/china,5.html
[3] http://www.answers.com/topic/bisexuality
[4] Bukhari 4.56.829
[5] Bukhari 4:52:220

---

Hello! I am Ali Sina. I was born to Muslim parents and defended Islam passionately until 1994, when I read the Quran. After overcoming the initial shock and ending the denial of my own intelligence I finally had to admit that this is a satanic religion that aims to destroy mankind. In 1998 I started my Internet campaign to stop Islam. In 2001 I launched faithfreedom.org/ where former Muslims and all those who were concerned about the threat of Islam found a venue to express their views. Source: Alisina.org

---